---
title: Ransomware Recovery Planning for 2027 | SilverSky
description: Learn why backups alone are not enough for ransomware recovery in 2027. Explore backup validation, identity recovery, incident readiness, and resilience.
image: https://silversky.com/hubfs/RECOVERY%20IS%20A%20SECURITY%20CONTROL-1.jpg
---

[Skip to the main content.](https://silversky.com/silver-linings/ransomware-recovery-planning-for-2027#main-content)

[![SilverSky Logo](https://silversky.com/hs-fs/hubfs/SS_LogoHorizontal_Grey_no_Tagline.png?width=588&height=164&name=SS_LogoHorizontal_Grey_no_Tagline.png "SilverSky Logo")](https://silversky.com)

[![SilverSky Logo](https://silversky.com/hs-fs/hubfs/SS_LogoHorizontal_Grey_no_Tagline.png?width=588&height=164&name=SS_LogoHorizontal_Grey_no_Tagline.png "SilverSky Logo")](https://silversky.com)

- [Home](https://silversky.com)
- Solutions 
    - [Advisory Services](https://silversky.com/advisory-services)
    - [MxDR](https://silversky.com/mxdr)
    - [Managed Security](https://silversky.com/managed-security)
    - [Managed IT](https://silversky.com/managed-it)
- Industries 
    - [Education](https://silversky.com/education)
    - [Financial Services](https://silversky.com/financial-services)
    - [Government](https://silversky.com/government)
    - [Retail](https://silversky.com/retail-services)
    - [Healthcare](https://silversky.com/healthcare-services)
- Resources 
    - [Cybersecurity Maturity Assessment](https://silversky.com/cyber-maturity-assessment)
    - [News](https://silversky.com/news)
    - [Silver Lining Blogs](https://silversky.com/silver-linings)
    - [Executive Perspective Blogs](https://silversky.com/executive-perspective-blog)
    - [Case Studies](https://silversky.com/case-studies)
    - [Guides & White Papers](https://silversky.com/guides-white-papers)
    - [The Human Layer Podcast](https://silversky.com/human-layer-podcast)
- Partners 
    - [Become a Partner](https://silversky.com/partners)
    - [Partner Deal Registration](https://silversky.com/partner-deal-registration)
- About SilverSky 
    - [About Us](https://silversky.com/about-silversky)
- Login 
    - [Visit Customer Support](https://support.silversky.com/)
    - [Visit SMC](https://cloud.postoffice.net/auth/login)
    - [Visit Lightning Portal](https://silversky.outsoc.com/dashboard/)
- [Contact Us](https://silversky.com/contact-us)

[![Talk to a Security Expert](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/21462918/4f0bfeec-cd97-49cf-b9ea-92f207820d0a.png)](https://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/21462918/4f0bfeec-cd97-49cf-b9ea-92f207820d0a)

Toggle Menu

Toggle Menu

[![Talk to a Security Expert](https://no-cache.hubspot.com/cta/default/21462918/4f0bfeec-cd97-49cf-b9ea-92f207820d0a.png)](https://cta-redirect.hubspot.com/cta/redirect/21462918/4f0bfeec-cd97-49cf-b9ea-92f207820d0a)

- [Home](https://silversky.com)
- Solutions

    - [Advisory Services](https://silversky.com/advisory-services)
    - [MxDR](https://silversky.com/mxdr)
    - [Managed Security](https://silversky.com/managed-security)
    - [Managed IT](https://silversky.com/managed-it)
- Industries

    - [Education](https://silversky.com/education)
    - [Financial Services](https://silversky.com/financial-services)
    - [Government](https://silversky.com/government)
    - [Retail](https://silversky.com/retail-services)
    - [Healthcare](https://silversky.com/healthcare-services)
- Resources

    - [Cybersecurity Maturity Assessment](https://silversky.com/cyber-maturity-assessment)
    - [News](https://silversky.com/news)
    - [Silver Lining Blogs](https://silversky.com/silver-linings)
    - [Executive Perspective Blogs](https://silversky.com/executive-perspective-blog)
    - [Case Studies](https://silversky.com/case-studies)
    - [Guides & White Papers](https://silversky.com/guides-white-papers)
    - [The Human Layer Podcast](https://silversky.com/human-layer-podcast)
- Partners

    - [Become a Partner](https://silversky.com/partners)
    - [Partner Deal Registration](https://silversky.com/partner-deal-registration)
- About SilverSky

    - [About Us](https://silversky.com/about-silversky)
- Login

    - [Visit Customer Support](https://support.silversky.com/)
    - [Visit SMC](https://cloud.postoffice.net/auth/login)
    - [Visit Lightning Portal](https://silversky.outsoc.com/dashboard/)
- [Contact Us](https://silversky.com/contact-us)

[Linkedin](https://www.linkedin.com/company/silversky/) [YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/SilverSkyvideos)

 10 min read

# Ransomware Recovery Planning for 2027: Why Backups Alone Are Not Enough

[SilverSky](https://silversky.com/silver-linings/author/silversky) :  October 29, 2026

[Backup Validation](https://silversky.com/silver-linings/tag/backup-validation) [Ransomware Recovery](https://silversky.com/silver-linings/tag/ransomware-recovery) [Identity Recover](https://silversky.com/silver-linings/tag/identity-recover) [Cyber Resilience](https://silversky.com/silver-linings/tag/cyber-resilience) [Ransomware Recovery Planning](https://silversky.com/silver-linings/tag/ransomware-recovery-planning) [Disaster Recovery Planning](https://silversky.com/silver-linings/tag/disaster-recovery-planning) [Incident Response Planning](https://silversky.com/silver-linings/tag/incident-response-planning)

![Ransomware Recovery Planning for 2027: Why Backups Alone Are Not Enough](https://silversky.com/hubfs/RECOVERY%20IS%20A%20SECURITY%20CONTROL-1.jpg)

Ransomware Recovery Planning for 2027 | SilverSky

21:52

**Recovery has to be tested, owned, and ready before it is needed.**

A successful backup does not guarantee a successful recovery.

An organization can have automated backups, documented disaster recovery procedures, and redundant infrastructure, yet still struggle to restore operations following a ransomware attack.

The problem may have nothing to do with whether the data was backed up. The backup system itself may be inaccessible. Administrative credentials may be compromised. Virtualization infrastructure may be unavailable. Or the systems required to coordinate recovery may depend on the same environment that was attacked.

These are no longer hypothetical concerns.

According to Verizon's [2026 Data Breach Investigations Report](https://www.verizon.com/business/resources/reports/dbir/), ransomware was involved in 48% of the breaches analyzed. Meanwhile, Google's [Mandiant M-Trends 2026 research](https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/m-trends-2026) describes a significant evolution in ransomware operations: attackers deliberately targeting backup infrastructure, identity services, and virtualization systems to prevent organizations from recovering.

As organizations prepare for 2027, **ransomware recovery planning must account for more than restoring data. It must establish a reliable path back to trusted business operations, even when critical infrastructure has been compromised.**

## Why Is Ransomware Recovery Planning Changing in 2027?

Traditional ransomware recovery planning often begins with a straightforward assumption: if an attacker encrypts production systems, the organization can restore those systems from backups.

That assumption becomes unreliable when the attacker can also access the systems responsible for managing those backups.

Mandiant describes this approach as *recovery denial*. Rather than concentrating exclusively on encrypting files, ransomware operators target the administrative infrastructure that organizations depend on to rebuild their environments.

This can include compromising identity services, deleting recovery points, manipulating backup platforms, or attacking virtualization management systems that support multiple business applications.

A documented incident illustrates the risk.

In August 2026, [CISA and its government partners issued an advisory concerning Gunra ransomware](https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories/aa26-222a). Investigators documented an incident in which attackers deleted backup and archived data stored at both a victim's primary data center and its disaster recovery center.

The organization had recovery infrastructure in multiple locations. That separation did not prevent the attacker from targeting both.

The lesson extends beyond any particular ransomware group.

**Recovery infrastructure is itself a security target.**

Backup management consoles, administrative accounts, identity platforms, virtualization systems, and disaster recovery environments often possess extensive access to business-critical resources.

An attacker who gains sufficient control over these systems may disrupt multiple workloads while simultaneously restricting the organization's ability to restore them.

For security leaders, that changes the recovery planning conversation.

The question is no longer limited to whether backups exist. It is whether the organization's recovery capabilities can remain available and trustworthy after a significant compromise.

## What Is the Difference Between a Backup and a Recovery Capability?

Backups are an essential component of ransomware resilience. However, backup availability and operational recoverability are not interchangeable.

A completed backup job confirms that data was copied according to a configured process. It does not necessarily demonstrate that the backup is intact, accessible, free from compromise, or sufficient to restore the systems the business depends on.

A successful restoration test provides stronger assurance, but even that may not demonstrate complete business recovery.

Consider the difference between restoring an application database and restoring the business process that depends on it.

The database may require functioning authentication, network connectivity, application servers, certificates, storage, and supporting services. Employees may also need access to specific applications before normal operations can resume.

Restoring the database alone does not establish that all those dependencies are functioning.

This distinction is reflected in [NIST's June 2026 Ransomware Risk Management profile](https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/ir/8374/r1/final), which addresses secure and isolated backups, restoration testing, recovery prioritization, verification of restoration assets, and coordinated recovery procedures.

Organizations should distinguish among three levels of readiness:

**Backup availability:** Critical information is being copied and retained according to policy.

**Backup validation:** Restoration testing confirms that backup data is intact, accessible, and usable.

**Operational recovery:** Critical services can be restored in the appropriate sequence, using trustworthy infrastructure and identities, within acceptable business tolerances.

The third level is where ransomware recovery planning becomes a broader security and operational responsibility.

A backup system reporting success is useful technical evidence. Demonstrating that the organization can resume operations is a different and more demanding standard.

### Recovery Time and Recovery Point Objectives Must Be Tested

Two established disaster recovery measures become particularly important in this context.

A **Recovery Time Objective (RTO)** defines how long a business process or system can remain unavailable before the disruption exceeds the organization's tolerance.

A **Recovery Point Objective (RPO)** defines how much recent data an organization can afford to lose, expressed as a point in time to which information must be recovered.

These objectives should reflect business requirements, not merely the capabilities advertised by a backup platform.

For example, an organization may establish a four-hour RTO for a critical application.

But does that four-hour window account for investigating the incident, identifying a trustworthy recovery point, rebuilding identity services, restoring infrastructure, validating the application, and returning users to service?

If the recovery process has never been exercised under those conditions, the objective remains an expectation rather than a demonstrated capability.

For 2027, organizations should evaluate recovery readiness against actual business requirements and use restoration exercises to identify where technical capabilities and operational expectations diverge.

## Attackers Are Targeting the Systems Needed to Recover

One of the most significant lessons from Mandiant's 2026 research is that ransomware operators increasingly recognize how enterprise infrastructure depends on interconnected administrative systems.

A business application may depend on a virtual machine. That virtual machine depends on a virtualization platform. Access to the platform may depend on Active Directory or another identity provider. The backup system may rely on those same credentials and management services.

This creates a dependency chain.

Compromising one highly privileged administrative system can affect multiple parts of the production environment and the mechanisms intended to restore it.

Recovery planning must therefore account for the security of the recovery environment itself.

### Protect Backup and Recovery Infrastructure

Organizations should evaluate whether backup platforms are adequately separated from production systems and administrative accounts.

Offline, immutable, or appropriately isolated backup copies can reduce the risk that an attacker compromises production data and recovery copies through the same access path.

However, immutability is not an absolute guarantee. Its effectiveness depends on proper configuration, access controls, retention policies, and the security of the underlying platform.

Backups should also be routinely tested for integrity and accessibility.

A recovery copy that cannot be accessed during an incident provides little operational value, regardless of how securely it was originally stored.

### Secure the Administrative Control Plane

Identity systems, virtualization platforms, backup consoles, and infrastructure management tools deserve heightened security attention because of the access they provide.

Appropriate safeguards may include restricted administrative privileges, separate management access, strong authentication, segmentation, and monitoring of suspicious administrative activity.

Visibility is particularly important.

Mandiant's research highlights the risk of attacks against hypervisor infrastructure, where malicious activity may occur outside the operating systems monitored by traditional endpoint security tools.

Organizations should evaluate whether their security monitoring includes the administrative systems capable of affecting large portions of their environment.

This is where [managed security operations](https://silversky.com/managed-security) and coordinated detection and response become relevant to recovery readiness.

Protecting the systems required for restoration is part of protecting the business itself.

## Identity Recovery: What Happens When Administrators Cannot Log In?

Identity is frequently treated as another component of an organization's technology environment.

During a ransomware incident, it may become the dependency that determines whether recovery can proceed at all.

Consider an organization that relies on Active Directory or a cloud identity platform to authenticate administrators, access infrastructure, and manage backup systems.

If that identity environment is compromised, administrators may be unable to access the very systems they need to rebuild.

The recovery plan must account for this possibility before an incident occurs.

Microsoft's [Active Directory forest recovery guidance](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-server/identity/ad-ds/manage/forest-recovery-guide/ad-forest-recovery-determine-how-to-recover) emphasizes restoring identity systems from trusted backups and understanding which recovery point represents a safe state.

That introduces another important consideration.

The most recent backup is not automatically the most trustworthy.

If attackers maintained access before the incident was discovered, newer backups may contain compromised configurations or other unsafe changes.

Recovery teams need sufficient investigation context to determine which restoration point can be trusted.

They also need procedures and credentials that remain available when normal authentication systems are unavailable.

For organizations preparing their 2027 ransomware recovery plans, identity recovery should be treated as a foundational dependency rather than a secondary technical task.

The organization should know how administrators will authenticate, who can authorize privileged recovery actions, and how critical identity services will be restored safely.

## Incident Response and Disaster Recovery Must Work Together

Disaster recovery and incident response serve different purposes, but a ransomware incident requires them to operate as part of one coordinated process.

Incident response focuses on identifying, investigating, containing, and addressing malicious activity.

Disaster recovery focuses on restoring systems, data, and business operations.

During ransomware recovery, the timing and decisions associated with each process directly affect the other.

Restoring systems too early can create a risk of reintroducing compromised configurations or reconnecting infrastructure before malicious access has been contained.

Delaying recovery without clear priorities can prolong business disruption.

Organizations need established procedures for balancing these considerations.

### Define Decision Authority Before an Incident

Technical recovery procedures cannot resolve every decision an organization will face.

Someone must have the authority to isolate critical systems, declare a recovery event, establish priorities, approve restored infrastructure for production use, and coordinate external resources.

Those responsibilities become especially important when multiple teams or providers are involved.

An internal IT team may manage infrastructure. A managed security provider may investigate threats. An external incident response firm may support containment and forensic analysis. Executive leadership may be responsible for business continuity decisions and stakeholder communication.

Each group may have a legitimate responsibility, but the recovery plan must establish how those responsibilities connect.

NIST's updated ransomware guidance emphasizes defined roles, decision-making procedures, recovery prioritization, and communication planning.

For regulated organizations, this also matters beyond the immediate technical response.

Financial institutions, healthcare providers, and other audit-driven organizations may need to account for regulatory reporting, customer notification, business continuity obligations, and documentation of recovery decisions.

Compliance frameworks provide important governance expectations. Operational readiness determines how effectively those expectations translate into action during an incident.

This is a practical extension of SilverSky's **Compliance ≠ Security** philosophy.

A documented recovery plan is important. Knowing that the organization can execute it under difficult conditions is what strengthens resilience.

### Make Sure the Recovery Plan Survives the Incident

Recovery planning also requires an uncomfortable but necessary question.

What happens if the systems containing the recovery plan become unavailable?

If escalation contacts are stored in a compromised collaboration platform, communication depends entirely on corporate email, or recovery credentials are accessible only through an unavailable identity system, the response process may be delayed before restoration even begins.

Organizations should maintain appropriate out-of-band communication methods and secure access to essential recovery instructions, contacts, and credentials.

Leadership and technical teams need a reliable way to coordinate decisions even when normal business systems cannot be trusted.

Communication should be treated as part of the recovery capability, not an administrative task that follows technical restoration.

## Backup Validation: Test Whether the Business Can Actually Resume

A ransomware recovery plan should be evaluated against realistic conditions, not only routine system failures.

Traditional backup testing may demonstrate that a file, database, or virtual machine can be restored.

That remains valuable. However, ransomware recovery requires additional validation because the underlying infrastructure may have been deliberately compromised.

A meaningful exercise should challenge the assumptions on which the recovery plan depends.

Consider a tabletop scenario in which ransomware has affected production systems, the primary identity environment is considered untrusted, the backup console is inaccessible through normal administrative accounts, and corporate email is unavailable.

The organization must decide which systems can be trusted, which backups are appropriate, how recovery personnel will communicate, and who has authority to approve restoration.

This scenario tests much more than technical backup functionality.

It evaluates whether security, IT, infrastructure, leadership, and external providers can coordinate under conditions that resemble an actual cyber incident.

Tabletop exercises should be supplemented by technical restoration testing. A discussion can identify decision and process gaps, but it cannot prove that a critical service will restore successfully.

Testing should also reflect changes in applications, infrastructure, identity systems, recovery architecture, and business priorities.

The objective is to discover limitations while the organization still has the opportunity to address them.

## Six Questions to Evaluate Your Ransomware Recovery Plan for 2027

Security and IT leaders can use these questions to identify potential gaps in recovery readiness:

1. **Can we restore critical services if our primary identity infrastructure is unavailable or compromised?** Recovery should not depend entirely on an identity system that may be part of the incident.
2. **Are backup and recovery systems protected from the same administrative compromise that could affect production?** Evaluate privileged access, segmentation, isolation, and backup integrity.
3. **When did we last complete an actual restoration test?** Confirm that critical applications and their dependencies can be restored, not simply that scheduled backup jobs succeed.
4. **Have we demonstrated that recovery can meet business-defined RTO and RPO objectives?** Recovery assumptions should be validated against realistic conditions and documented results.
5. **Does everyone understand their authority and responsibilities during recovery?** Internal teams, leadership, managed service providers, and incident response partners need clear escalation and decision paths.
6. **Can our recovery procedures and communications operate independently of compromised systems?** Essential instructions, contacts, credentials, and communication methods should remain available when normal systems are disrupted.

These questions can support a practical recovery readiness assessment, but they should also inform recurring exercises, technical validation, and ongoing operational improvement.

## How SilverSky Supports Ransomware Recovery Readiness

Effective ransomware recovery planning requires coordination across security operations, incident readiness, and the technology infrastructure supporting critical business services.

For many regulated organizations, the challenge is not simply implementing additional security products. It is establishing clear ownership across these interconnected responsibilities.

SilverSky helps organizations address that challenge through a coordinated, environment-first approach.

Our [Advisory Services](https://silversky.com/advisory-services) support risk assessments, incident readiness, response planning, security strategy, and the development of clearer operational responsibilities. This helps organizations identify critical dependencies and strengthen their ability to make informed decisions during a security incident.

Our [Managed Extended Detection and Response (MxDR)](https://silversky.com/mxdr) services provide continuous threat monitoring, expert investigation, and coordinated response across supported environments. Earlier identification and containment of suspicious activity can help reduce the opportunity for attackers to reach critical infrastructure, including systems that support recovery.

Through [Managed Security Services](https://silversky.com/managed-security), SilverSky helps organizations operate and maintain protective controls across identity, network, endpoint, and other security environments, strengthening oversight of the systems that support both daily operations and incident response.

Our complementary [Managed IT Services](https://silversky.com/managed-it) include backup, disaster recovery, infrastructure management, and continuity support aligned with customer requirements.

Together, these capabilities help organizations connect preparation, protection, detection, response, and recovery through a more consistent operating model.

SilverSky works as an extension of customer teams, building on existing technology investments while helping establish the accountability and operational discipline required to reduce risk over time.

## Preparing for 2027: Recovery Is a Security Control

Throughout Cybersecurity Awareness Month, the central challenge has remained consistent.

Organizations must do more than deploy controls and document requirements. They must operate, monitor, test, and improve the systems that protect their businesses.

Vulnerability management reduces exposure. Security awareness and identity protection address the techniques attackers use to gain access. Detection and response help organizations identify and contain malicious activity.

Recovery completes that operational picture.

Even mature preventive controls cannot eliminate every possibility of compromise. Organizations must also prepare for circumstances in which critical systems become unavailable or untrusted.

That preparation cannot end with a backup configuration or a disaster recovery document.

It requires reliable infrastructure, protected identities, validated recovery points, established decision authority, and regularly exercised procedures that reflect how the business actually operates.

As organizations plan for 2027, the more meaningful measure of recovery readiness is not whether backups exist.

**It is whether the organization can demonstrate a trustworthy path back to business operations when those backups are needed.**

### Strengthen Your Recovery Readiness with SilverSky

SilverSky helps regulated and audit-driven organizations assess operational risk, strengthen incident readiness, and align security operations with business continuity requirements.

[Talk to a SilverSky Security Expert](https://silversky.com/contact-us) about evaluating your organization's ransomware recovery readiness and identifying practical opportunities for improvement.

## Frequently Asked Questions

 What is ransomware recovery planning?

Ransomware recovery planning is the process of preparing an organization to restore trusted systems, data, and business operations following a ransomware incident. It includes backup protection, restoration testing, identity recovery, infrastructure dependencies, incident response coordination, and clearly defined recovery responsibilities.

 Are immutable backups enough to recover from ransomware?

No. Immutable backups can help protect recovery data against unauthorized changes or deletion, but they do not independently guarantee business recovery. Organizations must also verify backup integrity, protect administrative access, restore necessary infrastructure, and test whether critical systems can resume operation.

 What is backup validation in cybersecurity?

Backup validation is the process of confirming that backed-up data is intact, accessible, and recoverable. Effective validation includes actual restoration testing. For ransomware readiness, organizations should also determine whether restored systems and their dependencies can return to a trusted operational state.

 How often should organizations test their ransomware recovery plans?

Testing frequency should reflect business criticality, operational risk, regulatory requirements, and significant changes to technology or recovery procedures. Organizations should combine recurring technical restoration tests with tabletop exercises that evaluate responsibilities, communications, decision-making, and realistic ransomware scenarios.

 What is the difference between disaster recovery and ransomware recovery?

Disaster recovery focuses on restoring systems and operations following a disruption. Ransomware recovery adds security considerations because the disruption is caused by an adversary who may have compromised systems, credentials, backups, or management infrastructure. Recovery must therefore include containment, trusted restoration, and security validation before normal operations resume.

 

- [Tweet](https://twitter.com/share)

Solutions

Solutions

- [MxDR](https://silversky.com/mxdr)
- [Advisory Services](https://silversky.com/advisory-services)
- [Managed Security](https://silversky.com/managed-security)
- [Managed IT](https://silversky.com/managed-it)

Industries We Serve

Industries We Serve

- [Healthcare](https://silversky.com/healthcare-services)
- [Education](https://silversky.com/education)
- [Retail](https://silversky.com/retail-services)
- [Financial](https://silversky.com/financial-services)
- [Government](https://silversky.com/government)

Partners

Partners

- [Become a Partner](https://silversky.com/partners)

Resources

Resources

- [Silver Linings Blog](https://silversky.com/silver-linings)
- [Executive Perspective](https://silversky.com/executive-perspective-blog)
- [Case Studies](https://silversky.com/case-studies)
- [Guides & Whitepapers](https://silversky.com/guides-white-papers)
- [News](https://silversky.com/news)

Company

Company

- [About SilverSky](https://silversky.com/about-silversky)
- [Careers](https://silversky.com/careers)
- [Contact Us](https://silversky.com/contact-us)

[![SilverSky logo](https://silversky.com/hubfs/Untitled.png)](https://silversky.com/)

- [Terms Of Service](https://silversky.com/customer-terms-service-documents)
- [Privacy Policy](https://silversky.com/privacy-policy)
- [Cookie Policy](https://silversky.com/cookie-policy)
- [Report An Issue](https://silversky.com/reporting-an-issue)

© 2026 SilverSky

[Linkedin](https://www.linkedin.com/company/silversky/)[YouTube](https://www.youtube.com/user/SilverSkyvideos)

 Cookie Settings

Return to top

```json
{
  "@context" : "https://schema.org",
  "@type" : "BlogPosting",
  "author" : {
    "@type" : "Person",
    "name" : "SilverSky",
    "url" : "https://silversky.com/silver-linings/author/silversky"
  },
  "dateModified" : "2026-10-29T11:45:00.912Z",
  "datePublished" : "2026-10-29T11:45:00.000Z",
  "headline" : "Ransomware Recovery Planning for 2027 | SilverSky",
  "image" : [ "https://silversky.com/hubfs/RECOVERY%20IS%20A%20SECURITY%20CONTROL-1.jpg" ],
  "mainEntityOfPage" : {
    "@id" : "https://silversky.com/silver-linings/ransomware-recovery-planning-for-2027",
    "@type" : "WebPage"
  },
  "publisher" : {
    "@type" : "Organization",
    "logo" : {
      "@type" : "ImageObject",
      "url" : "https://silversky.com/hubfs/SS_LogoHorizontal_Grey_no_Tagline.png"
    }
  }
}
```